"What Works": Research
You Can Use
Volume 30, Number 4, April 2003
Closing the Disparity Gap
Research Finding:
Middle- and high-income neighborhoods provide better
access to reading materials.
Comment
Access to reading materials is a major criterion in
predicting motivation to read and reading achievement.
Children in higher-income neighborhoods are likely
to be deluged with a wide variety of reading materials.
However, children from poor neighborhoods have to aggressively
and persistently seek them out.
There are more places to buy books in high-income
neighborhoods, including bookstores, drugstores, grocery
stores, bargain stores, corner stores and children's
stores, as many as 13 outlets compared to four in low-income
neighborhoods. Most low-income neighborhoods have no
place to buy young adult books.
High-income children have access to a much wider variety
of books. The total number of children's book titles
available in two low-income neighborhoods studied was
358 (one title for every 20 children) in one and 55
in the other (one title for every 300 children) compared
to 1,597 titles (0.3 per child) in one high-income
neighborhood and 16,455 (13 per child) in the other.
Comparing the print richest and the print poorest,
high-income children have 4,000 times the number of
titles available. Further, preschool book collections
in high-income neighborhoods were of better quality.
In high-income neighborhoods, school libraries had
more books per child (18.9 and 25.7, compared to 12.9
and 10), were open more days (5 and 5, vs. 4 and 2)
and had a trained librarian with an MS or MLS; neither
low-income school library had a trained librarian.
High-income public libraries had more juvenile books
per child (3.9 and 12.7, compared to 2.5 and 2.2).
Both were open two evenings per week (until 8 p.m.);
the-low income libraries were never open past 6 p.m.
In the high-income neighborhood, there are more places
suitable for reading (e.g., coffee shops with good
lighting, seating, friendly staff); thus, children
in the high-income communities are more likely to see
people reading.
Sources
Duke, N. (2000). For the rich it's richer: Print experiences
and environments offered to children in very low- and
very high-socioeconomic status first-grade classrooms. American
Educational Research Journal 37 (2), 441-478.
Neuman, S., & Celano, D. (2001). Access to print
in low-income and middle-income communities. Reading
Research Quarterly 36 (1), 8-26.
|